Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Bursting the format bubble.

Extended has changed, sets are rotating, fire and brimstone, lions and tigers and bears, cats and dogs? Pros are being "innovative" by copy/pasting last years standard. And most randoms still are holding onto the overextended rumor.

Inserting stereotypical "if you haven't seen it yet check this out".
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/95b
But more so this:
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/twtw/95

Overextended is a truthiness rumor, and shame on Firefox for not updating their spell check. There really was another format being discussed while the rest of us were having nostalgic extended memories and in some cases narrowed legacy thoughts. The "real" format the FFL were testing was nicknamed double standard, which is quite literally what it sounds like, standard, encompassing the past 2 years of magic, times 2. A sort of transition format to transition standard players into extended, sound familiar?

Whether or not you agree with the extended isn't as popular as legacy argument, the numbers speak for themselves. So instead of making another format, forcing players into a position to try and build a third (technically fourth) competitive deck, it was decided to try and re-enforce the one that was struggling.

If this isn't enough to sway you from hording your collection and all that depleting value Linus then wait as long as you like. Maybe the great pumpkin overextended is real.

1 comment:

  1. Excellent post, I fully agree with what you've stated here. For now, those of us who accept whats happened and see it as a new breeding grounds of decks, and for myself profit, will be the ones who get the most advantage in these early months leading up to what I think will be one of the most varied competitive formats we've seen in a while.

    ReplyDelete